Shared Content Block:
Styles for CDB Faculty Pages
Associate Professor
michael.mcmurray@cuanschutz.edu | |
303-724-6569 | |
Ph.D., University of Washington and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 2004 |
​â¶Ä‹â¶Ä‹â¶Ä‹
Figure 1. The structure of a homodimer of the human septin SEPT2 bound to the nonhydrolyzable GTP analog GppNHp (PDB 3FTQ) with the residues corresponding to those we found in temperature-sensitive yeast rendered as spheres. GppNHp is shown in orange. From Weems, et al GENETICS 2013.
​â¶Ä‹â¶Ä‹â¶Ä‹
Figure 2. Model for chaperone-mediated quality control of higher-order septin assembly. Nascent septin polypeptides emerging from the ribosome encounter a number of cytosolic chaperones during subsequent de novo folding. Wild-type septins efficiently adopt quasi-native conformations, thereby burying hydrophobic residues and escaping chaperone-mediated sequestration. Heterodimerization with other septins—the first oligomerization step toward septin filament assembly—occurs concomitant with exit from the chamber of the cytosolic chaperonin CCT (also called TRiC). Mutant septins that inefficiently fold the G heterodimerization interface are slower to achieve a conformation allowing chaperone release. Interactions with the prefoldin complex (PFD), the Hsp40 chaperone Ydj1, and the disaggregase Hsp104 are particularly prolonged, leading to a delay in availability of the mutant septin for hetero-oligomerization. From Johnson, et al Mol Biol Cell 2015.
​â¶Ä‹â¶Ä‹â¶Ä‹
Figure 3. Model for the step-wise assembly of yeast septin hetero-octamers. From Weems & McMurray, eLife 2017.
​â¶Ä‹â¶Ä‹â¶Ä‹
Figure 4. Model for the defects in prospore membrane (PSM) biogenesis in septin-mutant yeast cells. SPB, spindle pole body; LEP, leading edge protein. From Heasley & McMurray, Molecular Biology of the Cell 2016.
Our research focuses on identifying molecular mechanisms underlying the assembly of macromolecular complexes, with a focus on multisubunit complexes formed by septin proteins. All cellular processes require the function of multisubunit complexes, and while much attention has been given to solving the final structures of such assemblies, comparatively little is known about how individual subunits adopt oligomerization-competent conformations and find their partner subunits in the crowded, dynamic cellular milieu.
In our research we mostly use the premiere eukaryotic experimental system for genetic analysis, the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Studies of septin protein function in yeast gametogenesis led us to begin to explore some fundamental unanswered questions about yeast gametes.
Below is a summary of recent research from our group in these two areas.
“What does GTP do for septins?” This question was posed in 2002 in Current Biology by Tim Mitchison and Chris Field, reflecting the awareness that septins clearly evolved from an ancestral GTPase and most septins bind GTP, but some do not hydrolyze it and nucleotide exchange is very slow. How GTP binding and/or hydrolysis relates to septin structure or function was unknown. Over the last 13 years, my lab answered this question. Using simple genetic approaches, we demonstrated that GTP binding is dispensable for septin function and merely guides de novo folding towards an oligomerization-competent state (). We next developed a new method for determining the temporal order of protein-protein interactions in living cells, and with it revealed the step-wise pathway for septin hetero-octamer assembly in yeast (). In doing so, we found that slow GTP hydrolysis by one septin enforces order of assembly and mediates the choice of incorporation of the two alternative “competing” subunits at one subunit position in septin octamers (). During yeast evolution loss of GTP hydrolysis by another septin eliminated an alternate assembly pathway that humans and other fungi use to make hexamers in addition to octamers (). Slow GTP hydrolysis controls septin assembly pathways by creating a transient GTP-bound septin that has a distinct affinity for partner septins compared to the GDP-bound form (Weems and McMurray, 2017; ). Crucially, this feature allows septin assembly pathways to respond to the GTP:GDP ratio in the cytoplasm (), providing a way for cells to tailor the composition of their septin complexes to current cellular demands. Human cells almost certainly use this mechanism to choose what kinds of complexes they assemble from the 13 distinct human septin genes. Finally, we revealed additional examples throughout phylogeny of how loss of GTP hydrolysis or GTP/GDP binding altogether drove changes in septin-septin assembly interfaces that likely reflect adaptation to metabolic changes resulting in varying nucleotide levels ().
Requirements for de novo septin complex assembly. Monomers of actin and tubulin require folding assistance from cytosolic chaperones. We first discovered that cytosolic chaperones mediate a kind of “quality control” over septin assembly, imposing a kinetic disadvantage on slowly-folding mutant septins that favors incorporation of wild-type septins into complexes (). These findings demonstrated a new role for general cytosolic chaperones in the expression of subtly misfolded mutant alleles, representing a new paradigm in cytosolic cellular proteostasis (). We next used direct in vivo approaches to identify septin-chaperone interactions () and a combination of in vivo crosslinking and in vitro reconstitution to show that specific cytosolic chaperones engage nascent septin polypeptides to promote efficient septin complex assembly (). We also discovered that simultaneous co-overexpression of two yeast septins (one fused to a small tag) is sufficient to drive an unprecedented phenotype: filaments composed of only those two septins localized all over the inner leaflet of the plasma membrane (). These findings represent key advances in our understanding of the molecular requirements for septin-septin interactions, complex assembly, and membrane association.
Chemical rescue of mutant protein function in living cells. During our septin studies we serendipitously discovered that the small molecule guanidine hydrochloride is able to restore the folding and/or function of certain missense mutants in vivo (; ). In at least some cases (including a mutant allele of actin that is linked to cardiac disease, and a mutant allele of ornithine transcarbamylase (OTC) linked to OTC deficiency) this rescue involves replacement by the guanidinium ion of an arginine side chain. Such replacement had been shown for some proteins in vitro but had never been demonstrated in living cells. We went on to explore chemical rescue by other naturally occurring small molecules, and found hundreds of examples of mutant rescue in living cells by molecules like DMSO and trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO) (). TMAO, found naturally in marine organisms that experience high levels of urea or hydrostatic pressure, rescued ~20% of the mutants we tested (). These findings point to influences of intracellular small molecules on protein evolution, as well as possible therapeutic interventions for genetic diseases.
Establishment of sexual identity and cell polarity during budding yeast gametogenesis. Diploid yeast cells produce haploid gametes by coupling meiosis to sporulation, a specialized form of cytokinesis. We studied septin assembly and function in sporulation (; ) and found that septins mark a cortical site in spores that directs polarized outgrowth away from contacts with sister spores (). We also explored a surprisingly open question: Since the four gametes produced by a single diploid cell are of two different sexual identities, and mating/fertilization requires mutually exclusive gene expression programs, how is it that these expression programs begin early in gametogenesis, before the gametes are fully formed and isolated from each other? We found evidence of a variety of post-transcriptional mechanisms that may inhibit translation of sex-specific mRNAs made “too early”, including antisense transcription and extended 5’ UTRs with upstream open reading frames (uORFs) ().
.
. Benjamin Cooperman, Michael McMurray. 2025
. Michael T. Brown, Michael McMurray. 2025
. Randi Yeager, Lydia R Heasley, Nolan Baker, Vatsal Shrivastava, Julie Woodman, Michael A McMurray. 2025
. Alya Hussain, Vu T. Nguyen, Philip Reigan, Michael McMurray. 2023
. Aleyna Benson, Michael McMurray. 2023
. Daniel Hassell, Ashley Denney, Emily Singer, Aleyna Benson, Andrew Roth, Julia Ceglowski, Marc Steingesser, and Michael McMurray. 2022
Galvin, John; Curran, Elizabeth; Arteaga, Francisco; Goossens, Alicia; Aubuchon-Endsley, Nicki; McMurray, Michael; Moore, Jeffrey; Hansen, Kirk; Chial, Heidi; Potter, Huntington; Brodsky, Jeffrey; Coughlan, Christina. 2022
Anita Ballet, Michael A. McMurray, Patrick W.
Oakes. 2021
Randi Yeager, G. Guy Bushkin, Emily Singer, Rui Fu, Benjamin Cooperman, and Michael McMurray. 2021
Daniel S Hassell, Marc G Steingesser, Ashley S Denney, Courtney R Johnson, Michael A McMurray. 2021
Discussed in:
Ashley S Denney, Andrew D Weems, Michael A McMurray. 2021
Lydia R. Heasley, Emily Singer, Benjamin J. Cooperman, Michael A. McMurray. 2020
Spiliotis ET and McMurray MA. 2020
Johnson CR, Steingesser MG, Weems AD, Khan A, Gladfelter A, Bertin A, McMurray MA. 2020
McMurray MA and Thorner JT. 2019
McMurray MA. 2019
Barve G, Sridhar S, Aher A, Sahani MH, Chinchwadkar S, Singh S, K N L, McMurray MA, Manjithaya R. 2018
Weems A, McMurray M. 2017
McMurray MA. 2016
Heasley LR, McMurray MA. 2016
McMurray MA. 2016
Schaefer RM, Heasley LR, Odde DJ, McMurray MA. 2016
Garcia G 3rd, Finnigan GC, Heasley LR, Sterling SM, Aggarwal A, Pearson CG, Nogales E, McMurray MA, Thorner J. 2016
Heasley LR, McMurray MA. 2016
Johnson CR, Weems AD, Brewer JM, Thorner J, McMurray MA. 2015
Heasley LR, Garcia G 3rd, McMurray MA. 2014
McMurray MA. 2014
Weems AD, Johnson CR, Argueso JL, McMurray MA. 2014
de Val N, McMurray MA, Lam LH, Hsiung CC, Bertin A, Nogales E, Thorner J. 2013
Bertin A, McMurray MA, Thorner J, Peters P, Zehr E, McDonald KL, Thai L, Pierson J, Nogales E. 2012
Garcia G III, Bertin A, Li Z, Song Y, McMurray MA, Thorner J, Nogales E. 2011
McMurray MA, Stefan CJ, Wemmer M, Odorizzi G, Emr SD, Thorner J. 2011
McMurray MA, Bertin A, Garcia III G, Lam L, Nogales EE and Thorner J. 2011
Bertin A, McMurray MA, Thai L, Garcia III G, Votin V, Grob P, Allyn T, Thorner J and Nogales EE. 2010
Garrenton LS, Stefan C, McMurray MA, Emr SD and Thorner J. 2010
McMurray MA and Thorner J. 2009
McMurray MA and Thorner J. 2009
McMurray MA and Thorner J. 2008
McMurray MA Thorner J. 2008
Bertin A*, McMurray MA*, Grob P*, Park SS, Garcia G 3rd, Patanwala I, Ng HL, Alber T, Thorner J, Nogales E. 2008
Alya Hussain
PhD student (Structural Biology and Biochemistry Program)
Michael Brown
PhD student (Molecular Biology Program)
Marc Steingesser
Lab Manager (and lab dad)
Ben Cooperman, PhD
Pursuing a position in industry
Randi Yeager, PhD
Sales Specialist at Oxford Nanopore
Aleyna Benson
Research Associate II at KBI Biopharma
Daniel Hassell
PhD student in the Molecular, Cell, and Development program, University of Âé¶¹´«Ã½¸ßÇå Boulder
Ashley Denney, MD, PhD
Resident Physician, University of Âé¶¹´«Ã½¸ßÇå
Andrew Roth, PhD
Research Writer and Regulatory Specialist in the Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research, University of Âé¶¹´«Ã½¸ßÇå AMC
​J.P. Darling-Munson
AAV Research Associate, Rocket Pharmaceuticals
​Emily Singer
PhD student in the Molecular Biology program, Princeton University
Lydia Heasley, PhD
Assistant Professor in the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Âé¶¹´«Ã½¸ßÇå AMC
Andrew Weems, PhD
Instructor with the Lyda Hill Department of Bioinformatics and Post-Doc in the Danuser Lab, UT Southwestern Medical Center
Courtney Johnson
Dental School student,University of Âé¶¹´«Ã½¸ßÇå AMC
Rachel Schaefer
PRA in Gastroenterology, University of Âé¶¹´«Ã½¸ßÇå AMC
Christina Coughlan, PhD, FCP, SI, EMT
Research instructor in Department of Neurology, University of Âé¶¹´«Ã½¸ßÇå AMC
Funded by the National Science Foundation through award 1928900
After >100 years of study, the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is the best understood eukaryotic cell. A key feature that makes S. cerevisiae such a powerful tool for genetical manipulation is the efficient alternation of haploid and diploid phases (Fig. 1). Upon nutrient deprivation, most diploid S. cerevisiae strains undergo meiosis and sporulation, typically producing four haploid spores within each sporulating cell. Each spore is encased in a specialized wall that confers resistance to a variety of environmental stressors. As the two mating types reflect alternative alleles at a single locus, each meiosis produces two pairs of spores of opposite mating types, "a" and "alpha". In the lab we prevent mating between spores by physically separating them before exposing them to nutrients, which allows them to grow out from the spore wall (“germinate”) and proliferate indefinitely via budding (Fig.1). Whereas a haploid spore from most natural isolates is able to switch mating types and, via subsequent mating with one of its offspring, return to the diploid state (Fig. 1), labs use haploid strains incapable of switching. Instead, diploids are made at will by mating between haploids placed in close proximity. The ability to manipulate genes and study effects in the haploid phase and then to combine different alleles via mating/recombination/sporulation is the foundation of yeast genetics. Exploiting this life cycle in the lab context has extended our understanding of the cellular and molecular biology of S. cerevisiae to a level of detail unparalleled by any other eukaryote.
Despite (or, more likely, because of) our focus on S. cerevisiae as a model for human biology, the yeast field tends to ignore the aspects of yeast biology that lack direct counterparts in human cells. Only recently have we begun to realize that in order to fully understand yeast biology, we must consider how this organism lives outside the lab.
Since in the lab germination is almost always done with isolated spores, most yeast researchers assume that if the spores are kept in contact, they will always mate. Not true! Spores frequently bud even when they are right next to a potential mating partner. Why? How does a spore decide whether to mate, or to bud?
We want to understand the circumstances in which a germinating spore buds vs mates. The research goal of this outreach program is to test the hypothesis that the tendency of a natural Saccharomyces isolate to bud vs mate upon germination can be predicted by assessing HO gene function. The HO gene is essential for mating-type switching and is only expressed in haploid cells that have budded at least once (Fig. 1). HO is thought to have evolved to allow a return to diploidy in cases where spores are dispersed. This trait is called homothallism; the failure to do so is heterothallism. If a strain never sporulates or always mates upon germination (no “lonely spores”), HO is never expressed, and mutations can, in principle, accumulate.
We hypothesize that natural Saccharomyces isolates carrying mutant HO alleles but capable of sporulation will be biased towards intra-ascus mating upon germination. To test this hypothesis, we isolate Saccharomyces species from the wild, sequence the HO locus in each, and assess sporulation ability and bud-vs-mate decision upon germination.
To engage the public in scientific research and enrich public school education in a way that also advances the research goals of our project, we involve members of the general public in the isolation and identification of yeast strains from the bark of oak trees or sourdough starters, and the identification of mutations in HO causing defects in mating-type switching. Here we provide a collection of resources that we have developed, which we hope will be of value to other groups undertaking similar outreach efforts.
In October 2019 for the first time we incorporated undergraduate students from Âé¶¹´«Ã½¸ßÇå Christian University in the outreach activity with Morey Middle School 6th-grade students. CCU students (Biology and Elementary Âé¶¹´«Ã½¸ßÇå majors) were exposed directly to what it is like to teach Biology to middle-school students. CCU students also received the oak bark samples and successfully isolated yeast from them, including Saccharomyces cerevisiae, which was confirmed by PCR of ITS2 DNA and sequencing. At the time of the COVID-19 pandemic shutdown, CCU students were attempting to amplify the HO gene for sequencing. CCU students thus also received direct, hand-on training in biological research. ​â¶Ä‹â¶Ä‹â¶Ä‹
Description | ​F¾±±ô±ð/±ô¾±²Ô°ì​â¶Ä‹ |
---|---|
​Intro lecture | ​ Wild Yeast Project.pdf |
DNA barcoding lecture​ | Species ID by DNA sequencing.pdf |
​Yeast ID by microscopy quiz | ​ |
Map of oak yeast identified in Cheesman Park | FinalCheesmanYeastMap.pdf |
The COIVD-19 pandemic closed Morey Middle School and the Aurora School of Science and Technology, preventing the planned Spring 2020 outreach activities. PI Michael McMurray regularly attends an entirely volunteer-led annual retreat for families with profoundly gifted children (PG Retreat, or PGR; ). The in-person event scheduled for the end of June 2020 was canceled, and Michael volunteered to help design and execute a set of virtual, online activities in its place. Michael realized that with the explosion of the use and creation of sourdough starters that accompanied the pandemic-associated shelter-in-place orders, a large number of PGR registrants would likely be interested in a version of the Wild Yeast Isolation outreach activity modified to use sourdough starters as a source of yeast.
Michael spoke with scientists from North Carolina State University’s “Public Science Lab” (), which has been organizing a “Science of Sourdough” citizen science project () that asks citizens from all over the world to measure properties of sourdough starters. Michael then recruited >20 PGR registrants to participate in a 7-week program that involved many of the same activities as used for middle-school students, but also included isolation of the yeast from the starters using homemade medium, and mailing the yeast to the McMurray lab for analysis. We were successful!
Description | ​F¾±±ô±ð/±ô¾±²Ô°ì​â¶Ä‹ |
---|---|
​Intro lecture | ​ |
DNA barcoding lecture​ | ​ |
​Home microbiology basics lecture | ​ |